jim ferguson wrote:I know what you mean Brian, but easier isn't always better. The deck I described would give a far more convincing display.
As you said though, without knowing its purpose our advice is based on what we are assuming. To be honest it looks as if this thread is a bit of a lost cause. Since the OP hasn't bothered to reply to our ideas we have no way of knowing if we are on the right track or just wasting our time - at the moment I fear it may be the latter.
Jim
Even if the point of the thread is lost for the OP you still bring up some interesting points. I always enjoy reading your posts and I agree with most of what you say.
Obviously I cannot agree or disagree with what you wrote above because well we can't see it. However I slightly disagree with what you say about a 'convincing display' to whom are you refering? A magicians perspective? then I would agree. From a layman's view however there is only convincing and not convincing. I show them 52 3 of hearts using the method we both know I am talking about and they buy it hook line and sinker then that is all the convincing that is needed. Fanning the deck won't make it any more convincing.
And of course it all comes down to presention.